By Kevin Ash
Pictures: Castrol, press various
(click on images for full size)
So should you? Or shouldnt you? The brand new bike parked outside is gleaming. Youve just polished it for the third time today, it looks gorgeous in the sun and seeing as youve spent the biggest part of nine grand buying it, naturally you want to look after it as best you can. Youll get it serviced, keep it clean, lock it up... but how about the engine? This is possibly the single most complex and finely made mechanical device you will ever buy, its by far the most expensive component on your bike, and you not only want it to last, you want it to perform to its full potential.
So should you run it in? And just as important, how? Ask ten mates and youll get ten answers, then another five from your dealer, the manufacturer, a workshop mechanic, a magazine helpline and the back of a special running-in oil container. For once, and at last, we have the definitive answer, which includes how to do it and for how long, but first well justify how we arrive at that by taking a look at what really happens when you run a brand new engine in the early stages of its life.
Its worth bearing in mind that well be talking only about modern liquid-cooled four-stroke engines for new Royal Enfields, rebuilt RD400 Yamahas and anything more than ten years old with new parts, this doesnt apply, although the information will help.
The first myth to debunk is that modern engines dont need running in at all, although theres a twist: with many bikes (depending on capacity) running them normally with few concessions to their newness will run them in just fine. At which point it will help to know exactly what running in means....
There are two main processes which take place when a new engine is run in, called conformability and surface finishing, and two main areas where these can apply. Conforming describes the shape changing which occurs as components wear to fit each other better, while surface finishing is about the alterations at a microscopic level which happen where moving surfaces pass over each other. Modern plain bearings such as you get in crankshaft journals, big ends and small ends are manufactured with sufficient accuracy that no conforming takes place, and so it shouldnt as theyre separated by a film of oil.
Also, they dont suffer significant distortion through heat or load. So the only change that will occur in the early stages of their lives is to their surfaces, which initially are machined. However smooth they feel to the touch, seen through a microscope theyre uniformly rough and jagged, like a micro version of the Alps, and the highest peaks can poke through the film of oil which ought to separate the bearing surfaces. Take it relatively easy with the engine and the tops of those peaks will be gently tapped off over do it and theyll be clouted hard and take large lumps of the rest of the surface with them.
Pistons and cylinders are more complicated. They have to deal with higher loads, live in an environment with large heat gradients and the most extreme temperatures, and the intricate shape of pistons means they distort in a complex fashion as they heat up. Similar changes to the surface finish take place on piston and bore surfaces, with additional lubrication considerations, and in addition, there is initial piston and bore wear which conforms the shapes of these two components more closely to each other.
One important aim, more so than in plain bearings, is to modify the piston and bore surfaces from the initial machined and jagged finish to one with a combination of plateaus and valleys. The plateaus perform the task of bearing the loads, which between a piston and bore can be very high, while the valleys serve as reservoirs for retaining oil, which not only reduces friction, it also helps with heat dissipation. The ratio of plateaus to valleys is important: too many valleys and excess oil will be retained on the surface, which in turn will prevent the engine from running in properly and increase oil consumption. A too-gentle life prevents plateau formation. Too much plateau however and the combination of increased surface area with reduced oil will mean higher friction, in turn causing more wear, more heat generation and reduced power. This can come from being too hard with a new engine, when youre polishing the surfaces too carefully, although other factors come into play which make life less simple than this. For example, on a lightly used new engine the bores become coated with a lacquer which stops further running in and surface modification, leaving you with high oil consumption and poor ring sealing, while in a hard usage engine you can find deep scores and even minor picking up in the bores, where the piston material is smeared and damaged.
Youll struggle to do this on a road bike used on the road though. Sophisticated modern finishing techniques during manufacture do much of the job of running in for you bores are first plateau honed then fine finished, resulting in a surface not too far from a properly run in one, although theres still room for improvement.
Conformability used to be the most directly obvious factor in running in get it wrong and pistons would seize. The problem is that a piston is heated strongly from the top only, as well as having a fairly complex shape, so when it expands it changes from an easy round shape into a distorted version with high points that can squeeze up too closely to the bore. But modern computer aided design with its finite element analysis techniques can predict very accurately how a piston will distort in use, so much so that in practice it can be designed distorted to start with so it becomes round and even as it heats up. Its not quite perfect and with manufacturing tolerances thrown in you do still benefit from conforming the piston to the bore by running it in, which in this case means wearing it until the high spots, small as they are, rub down.
Nikasil and similar bore coatings help here too. These consist of very hard silicon carbide particles suspended in a softer aluminium matrix, which is easily conformed. (See correction by R F Wilson in comments below). Water cooling is also on your side, as this reduces heat unevenness and distortion with it.
The worst case is an air-cooled two-stroke, which not only has hot and cold gas running up its sides as well as the combustion chamber heat, the cylinder is full of holes which increase piston loads and distort horribly with heat. No wonder two-stroke racers always ride with one hand over the clutch...
So, your engine will survive if you thrash it from the outset, but are there other consequences? By conforming the pistons quickly you will increase the power output faster than an engine being run in, but the component surfaces wont stabilise, at least not until you start to use the engine less hard and the running in process can begin. This will mean higher friction, so the engines potential peak power wont be realised, and oil consumption will be higher too (although modern engines use so little in the first place you might not even notice). Youre unlikely too to notice the loss of a few bhp on a big sports bike, but you wont, as many an anecdote would have it, be getting the best out of your engine, which if nothing else will bother the mechanically sensitive.
Dont worry though if youve had to thrash your engine initially because some gormless oik in a souped up Astra keeps trying it on at same set of lights every evening you can restart the running in process to repair and stabilise the surfaces later. In fact, once an engines properly run in, its running in history doesnt affect its peak power.
But it does increase its power as its run in, and continues to do so for the first 1000 to 5000 miles as all the surfaces stabilise and conforming is completed loosening up, most people call it, as the internal friction reduces noticeably in this period. An engine wears very little for most of its life though, with wear happening most rapidly in the first 500 miles, then right at the end of the engines life, just before it finally goes bang or grinds to a halt.
It is true though, as many riders suggest, that you can be too gentle with an engine. Use it too lightly and the moving surfaces wont generate enough heat to alter their composition, with the bore lacquering problem mentioned earlier hindering things even more. The engine simply wont wear enough to conform its components or stabilise its surfaces and will remain in an odd as new condition for all its life, during which time it will wear faster and use more oil. Also, because its internal friction will be higher and the piston rings wont have conformed or had their surfaces stabilised, there will be increased blow by, where cylinder pressure is lost to the crankcase past the rings, and power will be down compared with a run in engine.
* How to run in an engine
Handbooks, as in most things, play safe in telling you how to run in an engine, usually suggesting 1,000 miles (1,600km) or more. But for once this can do more harm than good. According to Peter Brett from the world leading Castrol Technology Centre in Pangbourne in south east England, 500 miles (800 km) is about right for a modern bike engine. Running in now is more about cleaning up the manufacturing and stabilising the surfaces, which means taking it a bit easy for the first 500 miles, he says. Not too easy though! In practice, this just means riding normally. The worst thing you can do is load an engine at low revs, and avoid very high revs at first. Build up gradually and dont suddenly give it full power as you pass the 500 mile mark after being gentle!
Theres very little a owner can do to find out if his engine is running in properly Castrol measures blow by, the gas escaping past the piston rings, but even this on many modern engines is minimal from new. You could always send off your pistons for a microscopic examination, but this isnt very practical... And as mentioned, oil consumption will rarely be noticeably different, even if it halves as you run in.
But do keep an eye on the temperature gauge. A new engine runs hotter because of its higher friction, and if the needle starts to rise above normal, back off the throttle or if its hot because youre in traffic, stop for a while to let it cool. Although liquid cooling and the electric fan will prevent real overheating, even so youll get higher than ideal localised temperatures which can interfere with running in.
Dont mollycoddle your new engine with expensive oils either. Running in oils are rare and completely unnecessary on a modern engine, but heres a shock, dont splash out either on a costly fully synthetic oil until your engines covered at least 5,000 miles (8,000km). This comes from the highest authority, Castrol, who would love you to buy the companys expensive synthetic oils...
Peter Brett says that theyve discovered synthetic oils actually interfere with running in, for reasons which go beyond their low friction properties - there also seems to be a chemical process happening which hinders it. Although you can treat an engine as fully run in after 500 miles, surface stabilisation continues for at least the first 5,000 miles of an engines life, he says. Synthetic oils actively prevent this from happening, and not simply by holding friction surfaces apart, although we still dont know exactly why and how this happens. But theres no doubt they inhibit the process itself. So the consequence of using a synthetic too early is your engine will never run in properly. I would even suggest waiting until 10,000 miles (16,000km) before using it in most engines subjected to normal use. Until then, youre best to use an inexpensive but branded mineral oil.
So, save money by using a cheaper oil when your engine is new, it will run in properly and you will improve its longevity, power output and oil consumption. Cant be bad, and that comes from people whose interest is in selling you expensive synthetics.
Its worth noting that when you do reach the mileage where a synthetic will start to be of benefit, only use a fully synthetic if its specifically designed for motorcycles with wet clutches (unless your bike has a dry clutch anyway, eg Ducati, BMW, Guzzi) or youll suffer clutch slip. Otherwise go for a semi-synthetic, but even then check its suited to wet clutch systems.
* Coat of iron
The irony with modern engines being so resistant to early abuse is that many, if theyre stripped down after a few miles, look like theyve run 50,000 miles (80,000km) on old sump oil. More specifically, the pistons on many bikes can look badly scratched and scored even after a gentle first 500 miles. Dont worry mister, they all do that...
The reason is a relatively new idea of adding a ferrous coating to pistons (ferrous being iron, but it doesnt sound as trick...) partly because it acts as a solid lubricant, reducing friction. In addition, it separates the rest of the piston from the bore, which is very helpful because when similar materials rub against each other they are much more likely to pick up and scuff than two different materials. Pistons are made of aluminium which also happens to be the base matrix material for bore linings such as Nikasil, so separating the two with a thin layer of iron reduces the chances of pieces of aluminium from one being picked up by the other.
The iron coating though is soft, and in the early stages of an engines life, small pieces of very hard silicon carbide are knocked off the bore walls. These then leave score marks on the pistons surface, giving the impression its already wearing badly. Its not, and the scratches have no effect on performance, oil consumption or anything else.
- MCN Tech Watch Archive
- Simon Hargreaves' Tech Watch Archive
- Big Piston Forks
- BMW S1000RR valves
- Brakes: What's stopping you?
- The Cross-plane Crank
- Ducati 1198 Technical
- Multistrada Testastretta 11 Degrees
- Honda C-ABS
- Hydrogen Fuel Cell
- Inertial torque
- Metzeler Sportec M5 Interact technical
- Moto Guzzi Concept Heat Pipes
- Moto Guzzi Concept Inconel Exhaust
- Running In
- Speed Camera Calculation
- Suzuki GSX-R1000 technical
Thanks for putting this together, there is some very useful information here.
"Proper" engine break-in has been a topic i have long sought to increase my knowledge of. I think this is a great article, but it does leave me with one resounding question. While warranty issues explain why manufacturers recommend a gentle break in, there seems to be no explanation as to why almost all factory fill oils in performance engines are full synthetics. Oil companies recommend petroleum oils, engine builders generally say the same, but OEMs usually opt for Castrol or Mobil 1 synthetic (which aren't really considered synthetics by purists, as they are group III based). Any thoughts as to why this might be?
This running-in article is the best and most comprehensive explanation of what happens within an engine during the first 500 miles +.Will point some friends to your Technical lists.Thanks again Kevin and i will post again when i get to the bottom of the Trip/Odometer saga on my Fireblade RR8.
Just a correction on the composition of Nikasil. Nikasil and its competitor Galnikal are not particles of silicon carbide in an aluminum matrix. They are particles of silicon carbide (about 5% by weight) in a NICKEL matrix (hence the name Nikasil). Nikasil is a patented process of Mahle Kolbenfabrik.
Iron coated pistons are not used in Nikasil plated cylinders. Rather, iron coated pistons are used with cylinders made with the Reynolds process, where the block is cast from an aluminum alloy with up to 25% silicon. After the cylinders are bored, the aluminum is etched back very slightly, leaving hard crystals of silicon as a wear surface. Iron coating the pistons eliminates the galling that might otherwise occur between similar aluminum surfaces of the piston and the aluminum matrix in the cylinders.
Thanks for the corrections, I'll pass those on to my sources at the bike factories and make a reference to this comment in the main text above.
But I'm keeping the English spelling of aluminium!
Fascinating reading. Quite agree with the ten different people with 10 different opinions on this. As a former bike instructor and new owner of a vfr800 vtec i kind of lean with the 'ride as normal' brigade.
When i was teaching, we used to use CG 125's and CB 500's and from the word go these poor bikes lived a battered existence. That said running in was a difficult process as everything got abused from the off. Surprisingly after about 5k miles, all of these bikes, despite the obvious dents and scratches had surprisingly good engines that ran like clockwork and never gave us any nonsense.
As to my 800, a quick trip abroad tends to do the business for me, i mean 6500rpm which i'm not supposed to pass for the first 500 miles or so, takes me into the 80mph range which is fine across the water and imho does the bike no harm at all. I must have run in dozens of bikes over the years, never cotton wooled them during the running in period, and also never had any problems either. Not saying this is how to do it either, but works for me.
i have many times given advice or mentioned to new owners about the importance of running in and am thankful for this article as years ago when i started life as a bike mechanic. My memories of one customer who did not hear all the advice of run under 5k for the first 500 miles then gradually take up the revs to reach 1000 miles and do not labor. He ran his bike under 5k for a thousand miles and then found it would not go over 5k. A quick road test found the revs in lower gears easy to get over but in top gear a bit hesitant....
With the knowledge on oil maybe my Ducati 916 is up to 32k now so maybe i might treat it to some fully sythentic....
In Lest we forget..., unconventional rebel wrote:
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, unconventional rebel wrote:
In HONDA NC700X, unconventional rebel wrote:
In Lest we forget..., davvy wrote:
In HONDA NC700X, kharli wrote:
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, pittsy wrote:
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, Navy Boy wrote:
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, malauder wrote:
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, Captain Scarlet wrote:
In Lest we forget..., malauder wrote:
In Lest we forget..., Captain Scarlet wrote:
In Naturally self-centring, pittsy wrote:
In Naturally self-centring, kharli wrote:
In Naturally self-centring, pittsy wrote:
In HONDA NC700X, kharli wrote:
In Naturally self-centring, shuggiemac wrote:
In HONDA NC700X, Grump wrote:
In HONDA NC700X, fishmanboy wrote:
In HONDA NC700X, Grump wrote:
In HONDA NC700X, kharli wrote:
Search This Site
Donate to the Kevin Ash Fund
Kevin's funeral was held on Thursday 28th February 2013 and was well attended by family, friends and colleagues.
The Telegraph has very kindly established The Telegraph Kevin Ash Fund to assist with the education of Kevin's three daughters.
If you'd like to make a donation then you can use the PayPal 'Donate' button below which will allow you to donate from your PayPal account, or via credit or debit card. A small percentage (about 3.4%) will be retained by PayPal for the service.
Kevin's family have been touched by the generosity and messages of support from people using the website and would like to express their gratitude to those who have contributed in any way.
The donations keep coming in, thank you so much, and the family especially like it when you leave a message.