Harley-Davidson XR1200

Harley_XR1200By Kevin Ash
Pictures: Double Red

Harley-Davidson has some explaining to do back home. The Milwaukee factory might not be known for its race track prowess here in Europe, but in the States where dirt track racing is a major sport, Harley is utterly dominant.

You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.

Indeed, its XR750 is arguably the most successful racing bike of any type in history, clocking up many more wins than any other since its introduction in 1970, although the rules have been regularly tweaked to help the home team. In fact the first model was a stopgap, based on the Sportster road bike with iron cylinders, but in 1972 the alloy engine version appeared, and even today it still makes up most of the grid of an American dirt track race (click here for a full, illustrated XR750 history).

 Harley_XR1200_02Click on image for gallery
This iconic machine was the inspiration for Harley-Davidson’s XR1200 road bike. And since its introduction in 2008 for at least a year, the 1200 is only available in Europe, which has made some Americans quite scarily angry, and they have guns so make sure you sympathise... This isn’t difficult as the XR1200 is a fine motorcycle: the reason we’re getting it exclusively is because this is the vehicle with which Harley is ramping up its assault on Europe, a move started several years ago but which has taken on a new urgency since the stagnation of sales in the U.S. So although the bike is based on the gentle Sportster 1200, it has significantly more power and is designed to handle European roads at European speeds. Sales are expected to big enough here to stretch production capabilities, so America just has to wait.

What translates especially well is the XR’s aching cool, right down to the riding position. Even if you have no intention ever of buying or riding one of these bikes, try this: find one in a dealer’s showroom, swing a leg over it and reach out for the handlebars. They’re fairly wide, fairly low, fairly close to you, and they’re angled just so, and before you’ve even touched the switchgear you feel deeply, irretrievably cool – I’m convinced Harley has nonchalant assuredness defined quantitatively on its computers.

XR12_21The rest of the look does these sensations no harm at all, from the twin, right-side pipes to the classic Harley racing orange paint (although the bike looks calmer and more sophisticated in the black or matt silver alternatives), but the visual core is that 45-degree V-twin engine, complete with Fifties’ style ‘Sportster’ logo cast into the covers. Harley knows all this very well, which is why the engineers were told to lose the airbox which obscures the right side of all other Harleys’ engines, a task they used to advantage by endowing the bike with a downdraft intake system to move the airbox into the fuel tank space. So on the XR1200 you see the full profile of that famous air-cooled, pushrod twin.

This also helps enhance power, up to 90bhp at a revvy (for a Harley) 7000rpm, around 20bhp more than a 1200 Sportster, and despite the bike’s hefty quarter of a ton dry weight, that’s sufficient to make it feel willing on the road. It’s not sports bike fast of course, nor indeed Buell 1125CR fast, but it’s not obstructively slow like a Sportster would be pitched into this category, and that will do fine as potential buyers will want the bike to feel good rather than be outright rapid. Crucially the motor has an air of urgency about it, and in addition sounds great while shuddering Harley-style through the bike with endearing low frequency vibes. The meat of its output comes in the 4-5000rpm zone, after which it starts to feel strained, but that’s fine for most road riding. The fuelling is perfect aside from a rare cough as the twistgrip’s turned suddenly from fully closed, usually as you start to exit a corner, but it’s not noticed much.

Harley_XR1200_04The chassis is based on a 1200 Sportster’s but like the motor has been reworked to tempt Europeans, with longer travel suspension, quicker (if not exactly quick) steering and twin front disc brakes that provide reasonable power. The result is a machine which steers beautifully at low speeds, perfect for hairpins and tight turns with its lazy confidence, and which works well when the pace gets hotter, remaining neutral and plenty accurate enough. Ground clearance is the best of any Harley, as it would have to be bring in more European customers, although the footrests do touch down eventually, and on the right side next to ground out is the solid exhaust system, which if you were pushing too hard might just lift a wheel. So don’t.

The weak spot is the suspension, which is underdamped, though not fatally. The brakes are limited not by their own power but the forks losing control of the wheel on uneven surfaces, while rougher roads get the bike bouncing too much, and the ride quality is not as good as a bike of this mass ought to have, instead being choppy. I like the XR enough myself that I’d simply budget to improve or replace the forks and rear shock, but they ought to be better from the factory – Showa equipment is used and it’s top quality, so it’s just Harley’s damping specifications which don’t work properly.

I worry too about the bike’s durability. Harley and subsidiary Buell have a history of patchiness in this respect, and sure enough the exhaust end caps on the brand new test XRs were staining brown in the wet conditions, as were various bolt heads. The detailing doesn’t help, with some of the fasteners looking agricultural, and for example the Allen bolts securing the handlebar clamp were filling with water when it rained – other companies plug them with simple plastic caps or use different types of bolt. On the left side, the clutch cable looks both exposed and ugly, routed around and below the engine, while you get no span adjustability on the levers, and the oil cooler is vulnerable and not pretty hung out on the left frame downtube.

XR12_12Many European riders will be frustrated by the bike’s three gallon (3.6 US gallons, 13.6 litres) tank capacity too, inadequate for covering serious distances regularly, which in turn will render the accessory luggage and touring screen redundant. In fairly hard use the fuel warning lights up with only half a gallon left after just 80 miles (130km), although I suspect most riders will just about get into three figures. That’s still not enough though, I’d love to tour on this bike as it’s sufficiently comfortable and the engine is so torquey at low revs, but this restriction on range would stop me.

It’s not perfect then, but there are plenty of riders who will love it regardless, and that includes me. Rationally I shouldn’t, but bikes aren’t about cold and clinical decisions, as far as I’m concerned it looks fabulous, sounds and feels great, and if Harley’s Bill Davidson once said of the V-Rod that it was the bike for people who loved the name but didn’t like the bikes, he really should have been talking about the XR1200. Flawed perhaps, but still a diamond.

£7,600 on the road.
Contact: Harley-Davidson UK Ltd, 0870 904 1450
www.harley-davidson.com

Specifications

Navy Boy
User offline. Last seen 21 hours 31 min ago. Offline
Joined: 12/02/2009

Hi Kev

Having read your report I've a couple of queries. Firstly how would you rate this bike in relation to say the 1100 Monster, Speed Triple, CB1000R and BMW R1200R? My wife rides a Harley Sportster and I'd love to join the HD herd however there's not much in their range, apart from this, that really gets my juices going (Oh, I do rather like the Road King too but that's going to have to wait a bit longer).

Is this really a Harley that you can enjoy the twisties on too?

kevash
kevash's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 days 2 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 05/10/2008

For me the main appeal of this bike is its style, charm, feel, even the heritage - in raw terms it doesn't handle like the bikes you mention, though it doesn't handle badly either. The main thing is it's heavy, so that takes some punch out of the motor, slows the steering and so on. As always, it depends on your priorities - the Speed Triple is very fast and handles brilliantly, ditto the Honda, the BMW is not so quick but the engine still feels good and it's fun (yes, even a BMW...).
If you like really chucking a bike around the Harley won't do it, but it does swing through corners satisfyingly.
Personally I'd have the Monster as I just like 'em, no particular reason, and it's light and does handle very well. But I'd be happy with the Harley too!
Blimey, talk about prevaricating... But for a month Harley is doing a major test ride programme, you should get along to a dealer and book a go on one:
www.harley-davidson.com
Go to the Judgement Days bit and you can book test rides on line.

centurysup
User offline. Last seen 1 year 20 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 18/04/2009

I took a "Judgement Day" ride on the XR1200 yesterday and quite enjoyed the experience. It didn't half make my 998 feel tiny when I rode it back from the dealer.

kevash
kevash's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 days 2 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 05/10/2008

Big ol' beast compared with the 998! Weighs about a third more too. But I reckon Harley will do themselves a lot of favours with this Judgement Day thing... just as long as no one rides the Cross Bones. I've had that on test and I'm still hurting from a long ride (okay, 120 miles...) last week!

Dodzi
User offline. Last seen 1 year 17 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 24/04/2009

Its surprising just how good the Harley work in the real world. I got a Fat Bob (I've had everything from a 955i to a Z1000 - the last 6 years with a GSX1400) and my wife picked up an 883L last year. We had some Austrian friends travel over and their hearts sank when the got off the ferry and saw what we were riding. One week later and taking them back to the ferry they all said the Harley's had surprised them a great deal.
I think the judgement days promotion is going to convert alot of old hands like myself. You get just as much fun from riding but 30-40 mph less than on one of the big jap fours! B)