Triumph Tiger Explorer
Hard to say Grump, as my bike tracks true rain or shine and I like the tyres, they seem well suited.
The only thing I can think of, a long shot, is that the tyre pressure sensors (assuming you have them) are out, or your hand gauge is out of calibration?
Lets us know how your investigation progresses, particularly rear wheel movement too. There's nothing on the T12 forum in similar vain, so seems to be isolated to your machine, which naturally must be very annoying for you.
Grump. There is a similar issue reported on the TEx forum and it was the tyres, proven when the demo bike wheels were fitted to the errant bike. I had a similar issue on an early 1200 GS and it was out of spec tyre compound .
Talking of tyres, is there a more road orientated tyre available for the TEX?
Mine will rarely, if ever, go off road....
Many thanks for the response on the tracking folks. I sincerely hope it is the tyres RIC, but the matter has been reported to Triumph anyway and I await their response.
I now understand that a certain amount of free play is tolerated on the rear wheel bearings. Seems that all of the bikes have a certain amount, even those still new on the shop floor. Probably some less than others.I await official confirmation of this.
Check out your front shaft rubber boot. A chap on another forum had one fail as it came loose from the front mounting at the back of the transfer housing. I checked mine and indeed the jubilee clip was loose. Problem is that the clip is fully tightened and cannot be tightened further. Again I have advised Triumph.
Like one or two others my front brake lever is slow to release the Cruise Control. I spoke with the Mechanic and his quick fix is to shave a little off the part of the lever that interacts with the brake light switch. It had occurred to me to do so but I needed to hear it from the dealer first.
Thats all for now.
Mine will rarely, if ever, go off road....
I have fitted PR3's and Dunlop have launched Roadsmarts.
Starting to sound like first edition problems now.
Got my bike on Tuesday, it's fantastic - in general/all over, and nimble on the backroads as Grumpy said. Keeping a higher speed than I used to do and the drive out of corners are amazing.
Washed it first time today - yes, it got angles/corners(?) everywhere but it's nice to do without the chain/greasy stuff around the rear wheel... My first bike without the a chain.
Using the CC on the highway it drifts +/- current set speed, but not a problem. Software update? I'm, for the time being, pulling the clutch when I want to disable the CC. Any other way to do it smoothly? Turning off the throttle or hitting front brakes doesn't do it for me (will try the back brake). It's sunny outside - have to get out for another ride. Have to wait another week for the panniers/tank bag/heated grips.
wonder when the first final drive failures will surface?
Wonder if I will ever get bored with this chassis/engine/gearbox/shaft drive combo.
Today's favorite gear: 4th! Proper enough drive out of the corners, smooth enough throttle control when entering and mid-corner. Still adjusting to the whirl of the three cylinder engine. My ears are telling me to shift up, tacho says stay right here(5-6k).
Sounds like you're having fun :-D Don't listen to the nay sayers, a bike is reliable until proven otherwise and there's not a lot of common problems reported, unlike most bikes I could mention.
I like the straight forward no nonsense approach by Triumph. I mean riddle me this, the BMW F650GS used to confuse the hell out of people, that it was a 650cc bike (erm, understandably so!) when in actual fact the capacity was actually the same as the F800 GS (bear with me), which was 798cc to be pedantic. So thankfully BMW have made things much clearer now, by revising the 650 nomenclature to F700GS. Eh? I mean, WTF, you can't make this teutonic shit up! :-D
Captain scarlet said: "Don't listen to the nay sayers, a bike is reliable until proven otherwise "
You're dead right with that. That goes for any bike.
I'm not fooled by the explorer's oversize swingarm, that tells us absolutely nothing about what is inside. But by the same token, there is no reason whatsoever to assume that there could be anything likely to give unreasonably early trouble.
Agreed about the F650GS thing too, although i don't feel quite so strongly about it as you .its like, what are they trying to hide?
"I'm not fooled by the explorer's oversize swingarm, that tells us absolutely nothing about what is inside."
... yip, and I don't actually think there's much in it size wise between the CrossTourer, Tenere and GTR14 respective systems either.
All those Japanese bikes appear to have reliable shaft-drives and I doubt the Triumph will be any different. If we use the BMW as a yardstick, then the proof will be more in the pudding between 10-20k mileage wise.
But as Triumph have openly said, almost in a boastful way, they believe their system is more robust than BMW's. So you would expect them to be able to back up that claim with demonstrable customer ownership experience moving forwards.
Time will tell and we shall see, but if anything, now my bike is run in the shaft drive seems smoother and quieter, so this is one area I'm not concerned about at present.
I wish it would cool down (close to 100F at the moment) as I want to ride more at the heat is so draining for a heat-wimp like me. I'm often not climbing on the bike for two or three weeks at the moment, which is giving me withdrawal symptoms. Still, it always starts on the ger-of-go, so I suspect it will start reliably enough whenever I next need it.
I agree with the Shaft observations. Triumph designs are heavily Japanese based. I have had several Jap bikes with shafts and no failures over big mileages. BM's have had shaft failures going back a long time. I once had an R100GS from new and the shaft failed on it. That is going back a few years !
Tyre wise, RIC would seem to be correct in his observations. As it wears, the handling of the Metzeler is improving. Other small issues are being dealt with. I am thoroughly enjoying the bike. A true test of this is that every time I come back from a spin I still have a big smile on my face. Only my KTM's otherwise do that for me, so this is a huge compliment to the Triumph.
One final issue. I purchased the Triumph Panniers and Topcase with the bike. I had no idea how heavy they were. The panniers and the topcase will add almost 25KG to the rear of the bike, before I even fill the cases. That is too much weight. These items are very well built but 25KG is still too much to add to the back of any bike in my view, before it is loaded.I would like to have the views of others on this. Thanks.
Tyre wise, RIC would seem to be correct in his observations. As it wears, the handling of the Metzeler is improving. Other small issues are being dealt with. I am thoroughly enjoying the bike. A true test of this is that every time I come back from a spin I still have a big smile on my face. Only my KTM's otherwise do that for me, so this is a huge compliment to the Triumph.
One final issue. I purchased the Triumph Panniers and Topcase with the bike. I had no idea how heavy they were. The panniers and the topcase will add almost 25KG to the rear of the bike, before I even fill the cases. That is too much weight. These items are very well built but 25KG is still too much to add to the back of any bike in my view, before it is loaded.I would like to have the views of others on this. Thanks.
I agree about the luggage weight, completely over engineered. Must have been designed by the shaft drive Dept. What is good is the ability to leave them unlocked and still gain access plus how easy they are to remove and refit.
By contrast I picked up some Honda Crosstourer panniers and they are feather light but not sure about durability. Triumphs design will certainly survive a nuclear attack!
Excuses! Get up early in the morning you lazy bum. There is generally less traffic then as well. I'm in 33 deg C by 13:00 hrs but at 08:00 it is 16 deg C. (Farenheight - 32) * 5/9 = Centigrade)
Actually I get up at 06:00 every day. When I leave the house for work at 07:00 the temperature is already well into the eighties. And often humid with it too. It doesn't even drop below 70F at the coldest part of the nighttime. It's pretty pleasant today at 90F. I might go for a little ride this evening when it cools down to 85F or so. Sixteen degrees (circa 62F) I wish it got that cold!
Well, i went for another ride on a T12 today. Lovely day in north Wales. Got to say - it's a blinding bike. Probably no quicker than my Super Ten over distance, but the way it makes it's power is enthralling. The motor is so flexible and willing. Bear in mind my S10 tops out at 7600 rpm - short shifters delight. The Tiger is most certainly more road sports orientated. I now can't wait to ride the Trophy. That should be one ace GT package.
Paul, have you kept the S10 too?
I was tempted by the Yamaha, following a demo ride. I thought it's midrange and top end were fine for the genre, it just lacked a bit away from the lights. But it was hard (and unfair) to compare the Diavel engine to it, which I rode to and from the demo on. I liked the finish quality and the feeling that it was low tuned / unburstable.
What would you say the pros and cons of each are?
Yes - still got the S10. The Yamaha is a softer overall package. The motor of both bikes define how you ride them. I find i change up quickly and just surf the huge levels of low end and mid range torque. The Tiger feels, and is, more aggressive. It enjoys revs - but it's far from gutless. Both are really good bikes. I do like the hassle free wheels on the Triumph (spokes are a pain) and the transmission and shaft are superb.
If i were buying now, and using the bike for roads only, then the Tiger would be the one.
Thanks for the feedback Paul, it's really interesting to hear as few riders own current peer models of the same genre.
People have different preferences, but it is good (reasuring)to hear that given a stiff choice, for the road, you'd choose the Triumph.
Two quick questions: Do you find one gives off more heat, that the rider can feel, than the other? And on long rides, which do you find the most comfortable?
I should add - i don't own the Tiger (sadly). It was just an extended test ride. As for heat and comfort, summer is finally here. It's about 28 degrees here. Not my favourite season, but nothing to what you guys have had to endure.
The Ten seems to kick out a fair amount of heat, honestly can't say about the Tiger. It was much cooler yesterday. As for comfort - the Ten is a bigger bike with higher bars, but the T12 seemed spot on for my 6ft frame. There are times when i want lower bars, which the Tiger has, and the step over seat distance seems lower on the Tiger. Just felt spot on all in all.
Yes indeed RIC, the luggage looks durable. However I believe the mountings are poorly engineered. The crossmember between the boxes is a robust, stainless steel rod. It needs to be as it will be under tremendous pressure at both ends. If you look where it meets the boxes, it is just barely under the top mounting. This allows the loaded box to have great leverage at the contact point on the rod , thereby also exerting heavy pressure on the top rear mounting to pull away from the bike. The 800 crossmember contacts the boxes much lower down, albeit that it is not as robust.
Furthermore the left box will always outweigh the right one with a bias being exerted at all times against the left side of the lower floating mountings on both sides. Time will tell how well the panniers hold up.
Has anyone read the comparison of the explorer vs 1200gs in the latest edition of BIKE magazine?
The dyno read out power and torque curves were interesting.
The gs made 99bhp rwhp, the explorer made 104rwhp.
Although the explorer made 5 hp more at the top end, the gs clearly had significantly more torque in the lower rev range.
This was also confirmed in the top gear roll on performance tests, where the gs pulled ahead slightly.
They also decided the gs was better handling and more agile.
Then to finish things off they revisited the honda cross tourer and decided that is the one to get if you ride mainly on the roads. It has they say, superior suspension and abs to the other bikes.
Interesting how noone seems to be able to agree on which is the best. Even something objective as the power and torque curves and acceleration seems to vary on who is measuring it.
Each of the big Adv type bikes has it's plus and minus points. The latest GS is a sorted package - let down by it's dull (by comparison) engine. The Tiger feels more lively, with a sweet motor.
As for the Honda - i'm finally getting a go on a DCT next week! Hussah!
Interesting how noone seems to be able to agree on which is the best.
Leighton - has there been any agreement on which bike is best in any genre at all, ever? I think that day shall never come and rather pleased about it I am too.
There isn't a lot in it between these two bikes, and what there is comes down to personal taste... well, except for varying dyne figures, I can't help with that! A lot of the magazines put a big store on whichever bike is quickest in roll ons etc, but unless you're racing them I can't see how that's relevant. If it pulls well when two yup with luggage, in a highish gear, and if it feels crisp and willing when it does so, then that's fine with me, regardless of if a similar bike is a bit quicker or slower doing the same. If there's a big difference that matters more, but only because it means one of the bikes is annoyingly slow.
Against the Triumph is its extra weight, the BMW is a fair bit lighter and it does feel it in handling terms, and it aids the engine performance too.
Then there are factors we've discussed elsewhere in the forum, such as the BMW engine making more torque at low revs, but because it's taller geared that doesn't translate as more torque at the rear wheel.
I think you'd be more likely to choose one or the other for reasons such as you like Triumphs, or don't want yet another GS, or you like the feel and sound of boxer twins/inline triples, or the local dealer is good/bad, or BMW's reputation for unreliability is worrying you etc. In terms of dynamics, they feel quite different but in the end do much the same job when it comes down to numbers. Mostly then it'll come down to opinion, and happily there's a million shades here.
Kev - have you managed to put the T12 on your scales yet? I'd love to know what the real world figure for it is. It didn't feel far off my Super Ten - probably a couple of Pukka Pies in it..
Yup, and it looks like the Triumph numbers are accurate, with a proviso: I measured 257.5kg with around 10 litres of fuel on board (I'll be more accurate later, I just have to arrive home with it empty or full!). It also has maybe 2kg worth of Givi luggage rack frame. Triumph quotes 259kg wet and 'ready to ride'.
If I took off the panniers racks and filled the tank, I'd get 262.8kg, so a few kilos to argue about but not much, quite possibly there's less fuel in it than I thought so that'll bring it closer. I'll do it with a full tank and the racks removed later but it doesn't look like there's going to be a revelation.
The Super Tén is quoted as 261kg wet, though I don't know how wet... if it's with 5 litres of fuel then that'll make it 11kg heavier than the Triumph, which you'd notice. I'll mail Yamaha and see what they say.
The Yamaha figure is with a full tank, which is 23 litres, so if use Triumph's figure which seems to be with a full tank too, it means the Yamaha is 244kg empty tank and the Triumph is 244.3kg. If your gut feeling told you the weights are the same, I'd keep listening to your gut feelings!
User login
Donate to the Kevin Ash Fund
Donate directly to the Kevin Ash Fund setup by the Telegraph to help with the education of his three daughters.
The Telegraph can only accept cheques and Postal Orders in Sterling. If you'd like to make a donation but you can't send a cheque or Postal Order then you might consider using PayPal, which will accept other methods of payment. A small percentage (about 3.4%) will be retained by PayPal for the service.
Kevin's family have been touched by the generosity and messages of support from people using the website and would like to express their gratitude to those who have contributed in any way.
The donations keep coming in, thank you so much, and the family especially like it when you leave a message.
Ads
NEWS...
* TRIUMPH TIGER SPORT
The Tiger gets a single-sided swingarm and another 10bhp!...(more)
* HONDA MSX125
Honda announces a spiritual successor to the iconic Monkey Bike!...(more)
* APRILIA CAPONORD
At last Aprilia goes for the GS too......(more)
* GUZZI CALIFORNIA 1400
Italy's biggest ever V-twin for the all-new Guzzi...(more)
* VESPA 946 FIRST PIC
Sleek new Vespa 125 based on last year's concept bike...(more)


Following on from my previous mention of the bike tracking on white lines and other linear road disturbances, I have done some further research. At this point I do not believe the Tourances are at the root of the problem. Friends have used them on GS's and Varaderos and the like without any such issues. My bike has been doing this from the getgo.Tyre pressures have been correctly adjusted.
The steering bearings have been adjusted. I still feel there is some play in the fork bushings. I would expect there to be a small amount of play for the forks to function properly but I am not sufficiently qualified to adjudicate on this. The Mechanic pointed out that there was similar play on the forks of a new bike on the shop floor.
I have now also discovered that there is a small amount of play in the rear wheel bearings. Now that is disturbing indeed given the problems that have been encountered on GS's.
The entire matter has been referred back to the dealer and I await further developments.
I have noticed that a friend with an 800 explorer has a rear tyre of larger section as standard, compared to the 1200. He had noticed this also as the 1200 rear tyre is noticeably skinnier, and was curious, as I am. Any ideas ?