So what happens next?
UcR said: "Fear not Pittsy, I have just the system for you. The rear suspension as found on a Mobylette, fully height adjustable too!"
Hee Hee. I'm looking for suspension, but I can only see a saddle. Is there a spring in there?
I assume you mean Irn Bru. Just because you have left Blighty to undertake missionary work does not excuse you from keeping standards up.
"Next level of sophistication is to tell it what type of payload as well as weight"
... I really like that idea. It's simple and practical. If we re already at a stage where we have semi-auto suspension with TFT displays, rather than leave it up to the rider to judge the suspension settings, the factory could work it out based on weight settings for front and rear seats, and laden panniers and/or racks. If the data was simple to enter and store (for ease of recall), then it would be easy to toggle between rides to suit solo/dual riders and fluctuating payloads. Good sugg.
"I think the idea of temporarily lowering the suspension has merit"
... I suggested it so that Dani Pedrosa could ride a KTM 990 :-D I do wonder whether the MP3 uses electronically controlled hydraulic locking for it's leaning and locking three wheeler? In theory the same sort of system might be adaptable to invoke and control ride height?
"I assume you mean Irn Bru"
... ooh, good point. Speaking of soft drinks, I work for a bank that up until a few months ago has always held the secret recipe to coke-cola within it's vaults. Rather fortuitously instead of taking payment for storing the recipe since it's inception, they apparently received stock options in coke instead. One of their better decisions no doubt!
Re lowering.bike systems.
How about utilising the jack up on a shaft drive. Locking it into place once it has lifted you up there. Don't know how you'd lock it. You'd need someone clever for that!
I think the hydraulics might be a better option!
Controlled riding height
Quote:
“P.S. Another reason it took so long to answer your good question regarding damping is that, in this very simple example of a hydro/pneumatic suspension system, we have a potential challenge.”
How much force does it take to hold up say a 15 lbs. object 36 inches above the surface?
How much force does it take to hold up the same 15 lbs. object 40 inches above the surface?
Would not the forces be the same?
So in our simple basic suspension system, how would it know when the desired or normal riding set height is correct?
One solution may be a bias spring so that different riding heights would result in slightly different system pressures to overcome the bias spring compression.
That way the suspension system would be able to control and maintain the desired or programed riding height as long as the pump is running.
The desired riding height would be set prior to moving the loaded bike but with the hydraulic pump working.
Some type of vertical measuring system would be required when the desired riding height is set.
As mentioned earlier, the bias spring would only be strong enough to just begin to lift the bike’s sprung weight plus maybe a 100 lbs. load.
This bias spring would also significantly lower system pressures and accumulator pre-charge pressure at the required riding height.
One of the goals of this hydro/pneumatic suspension system was to try to separate the sprung mass and its inertia and turning forces from road shock as much as practically possible.
One system handles maintaining the correct programmed riding height and another system mainly controls road shock.
A system that only has to mainly deal with road shock can potentially respond quicker/easier because it doesn’t have to deal as much with the inertia of the sprung mass.
Sprung mass inertia is a major factor in excessive spring bounce.
In my opinion, a suspension system that can tell the difference between road shock and sprung inertia loads would be a major advancement.
Regards,
JAG
Hi Jag,
There is a component already available which will maintain ride height and absorb shocks. It's called a spring!
Hydraulic oil won't absorb any shock at all, that's why you have had to put a spring inside your cylinder. Once a spring of the correct proportions is put in place to suit the payload, it will always return to the same height. Changing the properties of the spring to suit different payloads is the key and controlling the damping.
BMW have put forward a product which seems to go some way to changing spring rate. I don't know if it truly works, but if it does what it should, then it is a major step forwards.
After Spring rate adjustments, Improvements in damping is where it's at.
As most of the payload differences occur right at the back of the bike, most of the big adjustments for payload will be needed at the rear. The front end needs to concern itself with maintaining geometry and accommodating larger weight transfer figures. As far as I can see, any system with vertical front whel travel will go a very long way to having that area covered.
Hee Hee. I'm looking for suspension, but I can only see a saddle. Is there a spring in there?
No spring. The French wisely spotted that spring failure could cause a catastrophic effect on handling leading to loss of rider control. The solution was simple, a rubber block! Cheap and ultra reliable, it's only draw-back is a slight lack of movement.
UcR said: "No spring. The French wisely spotted that spring failure could cause a catastrophic effect on handling"
Knowing the French, more like they were worried about the damage to the family jewels!
UcR said: "The solution was simple, a rubber block! Cheap and ultra reliable, it's only draw-back is a slight lack of movement."
As a device to absorb shocks, I'd say that's a big drawback. I can see why it didn't catch on. : )
Would sir be interested in some on board hydraulics? You might have to pedal a bit harder!
A mountain bike shock absorber bolted on, under that there saddle, would bring it 21st century. Raise c of g too, which we all know is no bad thing.
Would sir be interested in some on board hydraulics? You might have to pedal a bit harder!
A mountain bike shock absorber bolted on, under that there saddle, would bring it 21st century. Raise c of g too, which we all know is no bad thing.
Ahh, but think of the weight dear boy! If there's anything I've learned from this forum it's to keep the old weight down.
And as for the lack of movement, the French though of that too. Just limit the performance. It's so simple it's brilliant!
Say it isn't so pittsy,
What is this sprynge thing you are refering to?
How can a hard piece of solid steel absorb shock and allow movement?
If hydraulic oil can't absorb shock, how can a steel rod absorb shock?
Maybe it's something to do with steel sticktionationability. That one's for Captain Scarlet. You may have to look it up in a new edition colonial dictionary. Unless you are too tyred to look it up after a long day trying to get the cola formula.
Pepsi tastes better anyway. Do Brits like warm Pepsi?
Regards,
JOG
Pepsi tastes better anyway. Do Brits like warm Pepsi?
JOG
No. Only real ale, proper bitter, should be at ambient temperature so one can enjoy the subtle mix of flavours. All other such drinks should be cold because the flavour is nasty or non-existant or just sugar, and the cold disguises this. The colder it is the less one can taste it which is a good thing IMO. :-)
I once read that all things act as a fluid, given a long enough timescale?
I still like the hyrolik idea, but how about air suspension? Seems to work well on commercial vehicles and Range Rovers? Air is lighter than fluid too!
Jug said: "What is this sprynge thing you are refering to?"....."If hydraulic oil can't absorb shock, how can a steel rod absorb shock?"
Witchcraft. Conjured by ancient Druids.
Torsion. It's a wynde up.
I think UcR should submit his mobylette to be sacrificed by the Druids in the name of science. Basically so we can hack it up and try out some of these whacky ideas. : D
How about this for a solution, whereby the coil spring and hydraulic cylinder both get to play a leading role.
Variable spring rate.
This has to be the next big step forward for the real world rider. The ESA II elastogran goes some way towards giving a very workable solution, but I'm still not convinced it is the definitive incarnation.
I'm not talking about preload or ride height here, that's a different thing in my eyes and one more easily (and already) solved.
Take a look at a cross section of the top end of an ESA II shock absorber, showing the elastogran mechanism. Basically they have placed two springs on top of each other and come up with an ingenious way of altering the rate of the top one, to the point of actually making it effectively solid when required. How else can we achieve the same end? Hydraulic locking and unlocking.
If we convert the annular chamber presently occupied by the elastogran into an hydraulic cylinder on top of the existing spring and then connect that chamber to a couple of separate chambers. These other chambers would each contain a coil spring, of different rates (we could substitute these springs for bladders containing pressurised gas). Let's say we had two extra coil springs. That would give us three spring rate modes. If we shut off the cavity above the shock, that would hydraulically lock the chamber, making it effectively solid. Alternatively, by opening it up to one or the other of the bladders we would change the spring rate.
Madness, I know.
Bit weighty too.
Back to the drawing board?
So the Cadillac CTS uses electronic ride height, that it also licensed to Ferrari from them to use on the Italia 458 I believe? And Range Rover are into their third generation of 'Magnaride' suspension on the Evoque. I don't know how this magnetic ride system works, but I can driven an Evoque and it rode the ripples in the road far better than my own Infiniti FX35 SUV. So could any of this technology be transferable to two wheels?
"Pepsi tastes better anyway."
... Pepsi isn't sold anywhere in Atlanta I don't think? Coke has way too much power here... y'all.
"The colder it is the less one can taste it which is a good thing IMO. :-)"
... agree. That's why I like my Merlot at room temperature!
"I once read that all things act as a fluid, given a long enough timescale?
... ha, you're a gas!
"we could substitute these for bladders containing pressurised gas"
... are we still talking about real ale here?
It sounds complex and weighty Pitts, but theoretically doable. Maybe. I'll wait for JAG to tell us exactly why the preposterous madness cannot work! :-D
Hey pittsy,
That’s a lot of springs.
You have some artistic talents, maybe you could post some simple drawing of your ideas.
I agree with you pittsy. The coil spring is a very elegant and beautiful thing. It’s simple, reliable, compact and very cost effective. One could say it’s almost perfect.
If it was perfect, though, you wouldn’t need so many in your proposed system.
Even in my system it would be difficult to eliminate the spring completely. It’s such a darn handy little thing.
Part of the problem I suspect is that we expect it to do too much.
The present spring, shock systems have been around for a very long time because under most conditions for most riders it works well. A modern well designed system that is correctly set up for one specific rider for a specific type of riding would be a very tough act to beat.
From Captain Scarlet and others I suspect, for now at least, in the handling/comfort department a really comfortable seat and handle bars could be higher on their list.
Regards,
JOK
P.S. What about a set of adjustable handle bars you could raise or lower a couple of inches? The higher setting for cruising and then lower them when you want to take the twisties or run at higher speeds.
Captain scarlet said: "It sounds complex and weighty Pitts, but theoretically doable. Maybe. I'll wait for JAG to tell us exactly why the preposterous madness cannot work! :-D"
It's not complex. Not in the slightest. But weight is an issue. The trouble with it is that, viewed alongside the elastogran, it's like reverse development. The extra springs, by the way, wouldn't be full size. Like the elastogran, they're there to change the charateristic of the main spring. Anyway, I've already thought of a mark 2 version, which is more compact and lighter.
If we look at what they've done with the elastogran, we can see the technical challenge. In esscence it's as if they've got themselves a progressive rate spring, and found a way of locking out some of the coils. They have seen that there are 3 modes required, that will cover most applications. They are: rider only, rider plus pillion and rider plus pillion plus luggage. The talk of hydraulic locking further up the thread gave me the idea. It's an hydraulic way of locking out sections of coils. And because it's hydraulic, the coils don't have to be actually stacked up, although, for my mark 2 version, that's exactly what I'd do. Stack them up on top of the main spring, inside their own cylinders, separated by a common piston. The springs would be either square section or, more probably, stacked disc springs.
Jag said: "maybe you could post some simple drawing of your ideas"
Doing the drawings is not a problem. I have tried to get photos and text files from my i pad to this site in the past, but it won't seem to work. If anyone can advise the best way to do that, mit would be appreciated. My drawings, by the way, would be on paper, with a pencil! I'd then have to photo them. I told you I am a Luddite!
Jag said: "If it was perfect, though, you wouldn’t need so many in your proposed system."
The coil spring is perfect for one job at a time. We are asking it to turn its hand to three jobs. We need 3 springs. The elastogran is a simple, elegant, light(ish) and cost effective way of giving you 3 springs.
My idea is none of those! Hah!
The coil spring is helical. So is the screw thread. Make yourself a giant nut (no not me) and you have a mechanical way of locking out a section of coils.
Or are we going to concede that the elastogran is the pinnacle of variable spring development?
Nah!
What about artic trucks? UcR, are you there? How do they overcome the problem of driving around with nothing in the back to fully loaded the next moment? Judging by the way they skip and clatter over bumps when unloaded, I guess they are just sprung for the heaviest scenario.
WOW CAPTAIN SCARLET !
I just viewed you GREAT video of your runin on the Triumph.
That was an amazing video. Loved it. Fabulious road and senery. Great riding skill.
That old road was on a 45 degree angle a lot.
The thing went on for 10 minutes!
You have to do more.
I am almost lost for words.
The last shot was perfect.
Thank you!
Now I understand why you place so much importance on good handling and light weight.
JOP
Jag, you're too kind (seriously). But thank you for the compliments, all the same.
Here's a video taken from the back of my Diavel last year. The guy following me is a policeman (honestly). It probably doesn't look it, because the camera vibrated a fair bit, but it was pretty quick in places. Check out the acceleration after the slow speed overtake at 04:00 in. That Diavel engine is a bit special as road motors go!
Maybe Triumph have solved our problems? Depends what their 'electronic suspension' on their new Trophy looks like:
http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/News/newsresults/New-bikes/2012/June/j...
Thank you Captain Scarlet,
Honestly, you have a talent for this type of video.
I like that you didn't add music or a song. You let the engine and wind do the singing. You kept it honest and true.
I have added it to my small collection of bike videos.
Now during those long gray winter months whem I am dying for a ride I can go for one.
My favourite before was the video titled "Sleepy ride through Atlanta". Your's is better.
Your video was a bit of an eye opener for me. No where in that ten minutes did I get the impression you wanted another 50 HP. Maybe I have placed too much importance on top gear straight line acceleration.
I hope Triumph gets a hold of you and offers you a big lump of cash to use the video in their advertising of what the Tiger really is all about and what it can do.
Respectfully
JAG
Humbled.
Triumph USA are about thirty miles south of me as I type, so maybe they should get in touch! ;-D
I think that Mike 'The Bike' Hailwood once said you don't need more than about 80 bhp on a road bike. Mike was a bit better than me, except in the hair-style stakes, so I probably need 90-100hp really, to ensure the bike doesn't have to work too hard.
More than that is often (but not always) nice to have, but is largely unecessary for 95% of the time IMHO. An 87 hp Tiger 800 roadie can cover ground nearly as effortlessly as I was in that video, without bouncing off it's rev limiter, for instance.
I rarely bother braking (except for junctions) on the road, or do so only very lightly the vast majority of the time, so maybe that helps in keeping the bike composed and the average speeds respectable? Anyway, thanks again.
What about artic trucks? UcR, are you there? How do they overcome the problem of driving around with nothing in the back to fully loaded the next moment? Judging by the way they skip and clatter over bumps when unloaded, I guess they are just sprung for the heaviest scenario.
I am now! Old trucks used cart springs (leaf) which as you say were set up for a full load, and ridged when empty! With a bit of experience you knew how much weight was on board simply by looking at the ride height. All newer trucks run on air suspension, big bellows on each end of the axles, these are so much smoother as they adjust themselves. No idea how they work though. :-)
That praise is well deserved Cap'n!
Pittsy wrote:
“The coil spring is helical. So is the screw thread. Make yourself a giant nut (no not me) and you have a mechanical way of locking out a section of coils.”
First let me say I like your basic idea. You are correct, locking out sections of the coil spring will stiffen up the spring. On a constant rated spring (where the wire diameter and the space between the coils are constant) your idea will stiffen up the spring.
The one concern I have is the screw thread and the spring. Under spring compression I would worry that the spring would tend to jam or tighten in the nut thread. This would increase the torque required to turn the nut.
I personally would prefer not to lock out coils of the spring. I would prefer to use a progressively wound type of spring and simply, remotely compress or decompress the entire spring by pressing on top or bottom of the spring.
To keep the torque as low as possible to change the spring tension (turning the screw) I would try to use a recirculating ball system. The same as used in cars with steering boxes.
If the torque was low enough I would like to use a DC stepper type of motor to turn the screw so the computer could control and measure very accurately the spring tension even while riding.
I think you system would be much simpler (cheaper) and more compact (lighter for the Captain) than mine if we can get away with a small DC stepper motor to turn the screw.
In you application the nut would remain stationary. The worm screw would move up and down against the top or bottom of the spring. With a progressively wound spring you may be able to get away with only one spring.
On second thought, it might be better to have the nut move up and down against the end of the spring and the worm screw not move up and down. This would make connecting the DC motor to the worm screw easier.
With an accelerometer the computer would know when you are braking or turning or accelerating and by controlling the spring tension, help keep the riding height or sprung weight more level.
JUP
Picure of a steering box.
"That praise is well deserved Cap'n"
... thanks. Somebody likes my style, this thread I started has had about 17,000 views! http://www.tiger-explorer.com/index.php/topic,1102.0.html
Hey pittsy,
If you go with a recirculation ball and screw system you may need to add some type of simple electrically controlled lockout to stop the worm screw from turning on its own when the DC motor is off or not in use.
I can see there would be times when constant loading and unloading of the spring would not be required such as highway cruising on smooth roads.
The lockout would only release when electrically activated. Some like of simple electic DC coil and rod and spring. The rod could have a simple cone that goes into the end of the worm screw.
JEZ
Hey pittsy,
If you go with a recirculation ball and screw system you may need to add some type of simple electrically controlled lockout to stop the worm screw from turning on its own when the DC motor is off or not in use.
I can see there would be times when constant loading and unloading of the spring would not be required such as highway cruising on smooth roads.
The Captain of course would not need a lockout. He works the suspension all the time. Might have to add a bigger alternator though on his bike to handle the extra activity of his suspension.
The lockout would only release when electrically activated. Some like of simple electic DC coil and rod and spring. The rod could have a simple cone that goes into the end of the worm screw.
JEZ
"The Captain of course would not need a lockout. He works the suspension all the time. Might have to add a bigger alternator though on his bike to handle the extra activity of his suspension."
... the eXplorer already has a bigger than normal 950w alternator, but I suspect the biggest assistance to the suspension is if I lowered my own lardy sprung weight :-D
Jag said: "You are correct, locking out sections of the coil spring will stiffen up the spring. On a constant rated spring (where the wire diameter and the space between the coils are constant) your idea will stiffen up the spring."
Actually I had in mind a dual (or even multi) rate spring! I can't see how locking out coils of a single rate spring will change its rate?
User login
Donate to the Kevin Ash Fund
Donate directly to the Kevin Ash Fund setup by the Telegraph to help with the education of his three daughters.
The Telegraph can only accept cheques and Postal Orders in Sterling. If you'd like to make a donation but you can't send a cheque or Postal Order then you might consider using PayPal, which will accept other methods of payment. A small percentage (about 3.4%) will be retained by PayPal for the service.
Kevin's family have been touched by the generosity and messages of support from people using the website and would like to express their gratitude to those who have contributed in any way.
The donations keep coming in, thank you so much, and the family especially like it when you leave a message.
Ads
NEWS...
* TRIUMPH TIGER SPORT
The Tiger gets a single-sided swingarm and another 10bhp!...(more)
* HONDA MSX125
Honda announces a spiritual successor to the iconic Monkey Bike!...(more)
* APRILIA CAPONORD
At last Aprilia goes for the GS too......(more)
* GUZZI CALIFORNIA 1400
Italy's biggest ever V-twin for the all-new Guzzi...(more)
* VESPA 946 FIRST PIC
Sleek new Vespa 125 based on last year's concept bike...(more)


![steering-ball-gear[1].jpg steering-ball-gear[1].jpg](/sites/default/files/steering-ball-gear[1].jpg)
None of this bothers me. I'm a Luddite!
Fear not Pittsy, I have just the system for you. The rear suspension as found on a Mobylette, fully height adjustable too!