Fuel pump on carb'd bike - why?

Can someone please tell me why my carburated 2004 Fazer 1000 needs a fuel pump? The fuel tap on the underside of the tank sits above the level of the carbs so I would have thought that gravity would be sufficient.
Thanks!

I believe the float height ultimately determines the mixture, so as long as enough petrol is getting into the float bowl to keep that constant (ie, as long as the inflow, however much slowed by a reduced head of petrol at low fuel levels, is at least equal to the rate of consumption) then the engine should run as well without the pump as with it. My guess is that as long as the carb is below the level of the fuel tap then this will be the case - it is on the Fazer and the bike runs fine without the pump on the stand. I'm hoping to take it out for a proper road test at the weekend, weather permitting.

Hi,
Fuel pumps on carb'd bikes normally serve to push the last few litres at the rear of the tank up to the carbs (obviously position dependant, eg NT650). They also help keep the float bowls TOPPED UP RAPIDLY when the float level drops, which becomes more important at high revs (high fuel consumption) and low fuel. Naturally, a full fuel tank will spill more fuel per second than a nearly empty one because of the pressure of the weight of fuel
Your bike can run without a fuel pump, but its there to eliminate certain combinations of factors that can run the float bowls dry.
Why do you want to remove it?
Is it kaput?

No, it's fine. I want the space it occupies under the offside side panel for a LiFePO4 battery. That will save several pounds in weight and will clear me some more space under the seat for storage.

Interesting question posed by wobbly. I'm intrigued. My own guess was similar to adilmon's in that ultimate power has increased and therefore fuel flow rate. So, the need to maintain a required pressure in the float chamber at diminishing fuel tank levels.
One thing to bear in mind however, is that pressure is determined by head (the distance in height). So, yes, as the amount of fuel decreases, the pressure will fall. This is because the head is reduced but is only indirectly a result of the amount of fuel in there. You could have nearly nothing, but as long as the head is the same, so will be the pressure. It is to do with the weight of a liquid, or more accurately, the mass, but not the volume. The volume will determine how long the required head can be sustained.
From (distant!) memory I think the figure for water is 0.43 psi per foot. The mass of petrol is something like 0.85 that of water so (if I'm right!) we can establish what the pressure is. I'm pretty sure gravity comes into the equation and that varies depending whereabouts in the world you are, although the difference is negligible.
Coming back to the original question, the size of pipe will influence the flow rate, as fluid flowing down a pipe produces friction and so pressure loss. The length of pipe concerned, the viscosity and the flow rate are all low so the pressure loss will be low.
BMW got around the problem by putting 2 taps in the tank, although I think this is more to do with the shape of (older) bike petrol tanks being like panniers, straddling the frame.
Maybe that's part of the problem in the case of the fazer?
I'm going back a bit, so I reserve the right to be wrong with any of the above!

Nice that everyone so far has refrained from the kneejerk "it was fitted by Yamaha so must be essential"!
The bottom of the Fazer tank is fairly flat, so the stock pump arrangement can't be anything to do with its shape. Before deciding to remove the pump I did some calculations: with the tank almost empty the tap passed 660 ml/minute under gravity alone, whereas on a fast cruise from Le Mans to Calais (270 miles) I consumed 6 gallons of petrol in 3 hours 40 mins - an average consumption of 124 ml/min! I know that the consumption will increase dramatically under hard acceleration, but the figures were compelling enough to suggest that the pump might be surplus to requirements. In addition, I've discovered that the Kawa GPz900R, with its fuel tap just above the level of the carb tops and not know for its fuelling problems, didn't have a fuel pump fitted...the only difference I can see is that the hose from the tap to the carbs has to climb up to clear the airbox on the Fazer - but then siphons are very powerful, aren't they?

Hats off for doing the testing. I would still be cautious before consigning the fuel pump to the black hole that is e bay. There may still be a good reason for it that we've not yet thought of.
As you and Adilmon say, it may be under full throttle acceleration, with a low fuel level, that the float chambers can't fill up quickly enough to match the amount being "sucked" into the engine.
Few more little thoughts: Is your bike the one where the cylinders lean forward quite a lot? If so, that would position the float chambers quite high, reducing the fuel head to almost nil... ? With a pumped system there will be a by pass return to tank for the excess fuel I would guess. Long shot, but maybe they're using this to keep the fuel in the float chambers cooler? Also, on a general note, I wonder if float chambers are subjected to a negative pressure? I think the fuel line must be once the float needle drops away from it's seat. If so, then this would increase the effective head, working in your favour.
Anyone out there know the answer to that last question on a more general technical level?

I'll leave the last question to the experts!
Although the Fazer's cylinders are moderately inclined, its carbs aren't 'downdraft' like those on the donor R1 and the float bowls are in a conventional position. There's no bypass loop - I think there must be a 'back-pressure' sensor that switches the pump off when the bowls are full. They're definitely not trying to cool the float bowls - there's actually a carb heating system fitted to prevent icing!

Definition of expert:
X is the unknown quantity
Spurt is a drip under pressure.

The fuel pump normally has a pressure sensor & keep the fuel line going to the float bowl pressurised. The float rising to position closes the hole to fill the bowl. The bowl is at atmospheric air pressure & there is no negative pressure drawing fuel into the bowl, only out of the bowl via one of the jets.
Don't forget, you can't rely on gravity on a fuel tank where tank leans on every corner & sloshes the fuel about with normal use. This is a big problem at low fuel tank levels

This all poses the question of how the hell did we manage on bikes with carbs and no fuel pumps for years?
I don't recall any of my old nails ever having fuelling issues apart from when they really just ran dry - which happened quite a lot but no pump on the planet could have turned air into a suitable hydro carbon.

I recall that the hondas I owned in the late seventies had float chamber vents, so that blows my theory out of the window! (wonder why they're vented. Isn't it enough that the tank is vented?)
Surely though, the same force which keeps us pinned to our seats when cornering, also keeps the petrol pinned to the fuel tank as if the bike were upright?

What about inclines and knee down or tight bends?
Where will the low tank of fuel be in relation to the carbs?
Fuel pump on carbs,
I don’t think manufacturers would install a fuel pump on a fuel system if they thought they didn’t have too.
I have an electric fuel pump on the carbureted Honda V65. Its not in the tank. It’s not a high pressure pump.
I like pittsy’s explaination of a carb with a pump. Does seem reasonable.
For fuel to enter the bowl, the air in the bowl has to get out. You also don’t want to create a vacuum in the bowl as the fuel leaves the carb through the jets. For fuel to enter the carb bowl the pressure in the bowl must be lower than the fuel pressure. I suspect the carb vent insures that the pressure in the bowl never exceeds or drops below atmospheric pressure. On American cars with carbs and fuel pumps the fuel pressure was typically about 6 PSI. It seems reasonable to say then that many carbs work best when the pressure difference between the fuel pressure at the fuel inlet of the carb and bowl pressure is about a constant 5 or 6 PSI.
Many or most are also internally vented. It is my understanding that the purpose of the internal vent is to maintain the correct fuel to air ratio as the air filter becomes restricted with dirt. If it didn’t have an internal vent then as the air filter becomes more restrictive with dirt the air fuel ratio would slowly become richer. Of course there is a limit and if it becomes too restricted (plugged) all bets are off.
As a side note, I have often wondered, considering the complexity of carburetors and the cost of manufacuring these devices, especially on multi carbureted engines, that modern electronic fuel injection systems might be actually cheaper. The cost of modern electronic controls has dropped quite a bit over the years. The injectors themselves seem actually much simpler in construction and may even be easier to make.
Sounds good anyway
JAG

Very good point from roundincircles.
I think it's brilliant that a seemingly innocuous remark about fuel pumps has opened up this debate. It's not so much questioning the fact that Yamaha saw fit to put a pump in there, but more WHY they have. To understand fully why, we have to prise away, as usual, at the fundamentals of motor vehicle technology. Which reminds me, I could do with digging out that book again!
I think the vent will perform two duties (at least). Mainly to keep the pressure in the float chamber at atmospheric. This will ensure the depression in the inlet will always work with a steady reference, even if that reference is slightly different on a day to day basis. Secondly it will act as a safety device, protecting the engine from flooding, should something go wrong with the float/valve/ attitude of the bike!
The pumped pressure supplying fuel can't pressurise the float chamber because it's vented. I think the float and valve effectively "throttle" down or regulate the supply to match demand. So there will be a pressure drop across the seat of the valve whenever fuel is flowing.
Feel free to shoot me down in flames!

Another thought on pumped systems. The float and valve have to seal against this pressure, which Jag suggests is about 6 psi. That initially sounds quite low, but is still considerably higher than a gravity system with only a few inches head. That means the float would need to be larger to add buoyancy, to effect a tighter seal against the higher pressure, or the leverage increased, or the valve diameter decreased, or all three!

It's important to keep the float chamber topped up rapidly to ensure there are no/fewer intances of the engine running lean. The last thing you want is a bike that runs lean only when you give it some revs. Especially since it would be difficult to diagnose.

I might be grateful of it running a bit lean when I'm low on juice....! New avatar shows the relative position of tank and carbs; the tap sits near the bend in the frame rail. Tank has been enlarged to 27 litres, good for 300 miles the way I ride.
Will test ride this weekend.

Thanks adilmon
Are we in a position to use your comment as a summary to give wobbly a direct answer to his question? (which I think is a very reasonable one to ask)
Is it because gravity alone is unable to satisfy that requirement?
Everyone will say: Why? It has done for eons before. What has changed?
Even if Yamaha had carefully altered the tank shape, increased the pipe size, done everything they could to keep the outlet covered, even up inclines, around tight slow bends, etc? If it comes down to scavenging the last half litre, why not just leave it in there? ! The tank has to be empty sometime!
Incidentally,I thought roudincircles' earlier comment about knee down (its effect on the machine) was brilliant.

BTW, excellent point from pittsy about the fuel being held in situ by the same forces that pin us to the seat.

Sorry pittsy, missed your last post whilst composing my addendum! Slightly confused, are you suggesting keeping the pump to enable me to use the last dregs that gravity alone won't be able to supply?

Ah. Re read it and I can see how it may confuse. I said leave "it" in there. "it" being the last bit of fuel.

Got it!

Wish I had!
A pump has an inlet and so is just as likely to suffer from fuel starvation if the hole ain't covered! Where do you put the hole? At the bottom. That's where it usually is anyway!
Going back to an earlier comment about siphons. These are fine until air gets in the system. Then they're a nightmare. (nightmare in a "bubble"car)
Thomas Crapper’s water tank:
The crapper’s tank works the same way as a carbs float bowel. Both have the same result. The level of the fluid in the tank or bowl remains constant.
The carb's bowl acts basically like a very small gas tank who’s fuel level always remains constant.
As mentioned earlier by pittsy, it is not the volume in the gas tank that determines the pressure at the fuel tanks outlet, but the vertical height or distance between the tank’s fuel outlet and level of the fuel in the tank.
Carbs must have a constant fuel level in the bowl to work correctly. So a carb's bowl is simply a very small fuel tank who’s fuel level always remains constant.
As the level of the fuel drops in the tank, the pressure at the tank’s fuel outlet drops. Plus the fuel pressure at the carb's fuel inlet drops.
The manufacurer would decide what the ideal pressure should be at the carb's fuel inlet. If that ideal pressure becomes less as the tank's fuel level drops they could add a small low pressure fuel pump.
JAG
P.S. Crapper - what a great word - glad to get a chance to use it.

Don't know if you realise what you've said with that last line. Ha ha.
I reckon that's 99 per cent got us our answer. However...
A diminishing positive head has always been there on previous generations of bikes. So what has happened on wobbly's generation of bike? More power? All other criteria seem to have been met adequately by gravity in the past.
The crapper water tank is a bit different. That is simply re filled to a level, whereas the float system in our carbs actually regulates flow constantly. Apart from when the engine is off but the tap(s) are on, I think fuel is flowing all the time. So the valve acts as a stop valve but mainly as a throttling valve. .... I think!
Thoughts from the throne,
You are right pittsy, for many years bike carbs worked apparently just fine without fuel pumps. Many still do.
So what has changed on some bikes?
I think it comes down to precision.
The carbs on many of the later carbureted engines were far more precious instruments than older designed carburetors. They were far more accurate in their fuel metering delivery than many of the older designs.
To achieve this higher level of control they needed a far more controlled or constant working environment.
You are correct when you indicated that when the engine is running the needle valve in the carb doesn’t completely close but reaches a balance point to maintain that important constant float bowl fuel height. The more fuel leaving the carb into the engine the more the needle valve is open.
Think of the slightly open needle valve as a very small orifice. The flow through this small orifice is dependent on the size of the orifice and the pressure difference between one side of the orifice and the other side. To achieve good control of the rate of flow through the orifice, the pressure differences on either side of the orifice must remain constant.
The greater the pressure difference, the greater the rate of flow will be. So conversely, the less the difference the less the rate of flow will be.
Fuel flow through the carb changes with engine load and RPM so the size of this orifice must change. If the changes happen rapidly you would want the pressure difference on either side of the orifice to still remain constant and at that idea pressure difference. The carb designer wants to be able to predict exactly what the volume of flow through the orifice will be under any operating condition regardless of the level of fuel in the gas tank and still keep the float bowl fuel level constant.
That was a really long one.
JAG

Jag
You do like your last line dooble on ton drah's.
Thanks for the eplanation. It answers the original question completely I would say. As ever, a case of design evolution.
Presumably wobbly and all other riders of similarly equipped bikes can revel in the improved throttle response, torque curve and occasionally outright POWER!! Which they wouldn't quite have had by relying on good old gravity. As you point out elsewhere recently, power is not everything for road riding.
Gotta go. Going to graft a pump onto the crapper tank upstairs.

Right! Am just back from a 75-mile 'gravity-fed' ride comprising everything from B road to motorway. A light comes on when there's about 5 litres of petrol remaining, and although it was already on when I set off the bike ran absolutely normally. I topped her up with a few litres so the light would go off again and I'd be able to zero the trip when it re-illuminated. After 25 miles on 'reserve' I came to the big hill on the Baldock bypass and gassed it from the roundabout at the bottom up to 9000rpm through the gears - she accelerated hard, without hesitation, and I then slowed to a more legal pace. A further 7 miles on (32 miles from 'light-on') I was cruising at an indicated 70mph when I thought I felt the bike lose power. There was a petrol station just ahead so I pulled over pronto - the bike idled fine so the tank wasn't empty. I put another few litres in and she ran normally for another 5 miles or so but then spluttered a couple of times before clearing! After that I filled her right up and had no further problems.
I won't go into an explanation of what I think was happening immediately, because it's gone 5pm and I haven't had my lunch yet! Oh, and my wife has just accused me of doing nothing but think about and ride motorbikes all day (which is spot-on actually).
I'm sure you'll have your own ideas, would love to hear them!
User login
NEWS...
* ROSSI NOT TO RETIRE!
Rossi uses Twitter to deny The Daily Telegraph's story...(more)
* ROSSI TO RETIRE!
The legendary Italian racer will be leaving MotoGP for good at the end of this year...(more)
* WIN A ROUTE 66 TRIP!
Harley UK offers Route 66 tour prize for two to anyone taking a demo ride...(more)
* AUDI BUYS DUCATI!
After nearly 30 years, VW Audi Group Chairman finally lands his prize motorcycle factory...(more)
* APRILIA CAPONORD SPY SHOTS!
PIctures snapped illicitly at dealer event show Aprilia's Multistrada rival...(more)


It could be to ensure the carbs have a constant pressure; without a pump the pressure reduces as the tank empties and you could get starvation at low fuel levels.