Fuelling about with maps
Selecting a power mode on your bike? The future’s already been mapped out. Literally.
Fitting a litre sportsbike with a castrating low power engine mode sounds like a bad idea, even if you call it ‘Rain’ mode. And few electronic aids are as contentious because engine modes are, technically, voluntary restrictions. Each is, broadly speaking, an overlay of instructions directing the ECU to manipulate and reduce engine performance.
But what actually happens when you push that button? The story starts with an ECU fuelling map. Imagine a blank graph on which the X-axis is rpm, and Y-axis is engine load. All points are a combination of revs and engine load for which a development engineer has selected the ideal fuel injection settings (how long the injector fires; its pulse width) for a given target or permutation of power, fuel economy and emissions. He’ll perform this ‘calibration’ during engine development on a test-bench.
Now suppose the graph, or ‘map’ is actually 3D, with a third axis of ignition advance (as revs rise, ignition must start earlier in the stroke to maximise power and minimise emissions). The ECU now has a tri-axis map from which to select the target fuelling. And if the target is just high performance, that’s all the info it needs.
But modern engines must be useable, efficient and clean too (for 90 per cent of road riding most ECUs run a map prioritising emissions and putting a smooth engine and civilised throttle response a distant third equal).
Now it gets complicated. On new bikes, an array of sensors feed throttle position, ambient, coolant, oil and exhaust temperatures, manifold air pressure, exhaust gas oxygen content, crank speed, gear position, engine knock, wheel speed, brake pressure and traction control status into the ECU. From these multiple permutations (think of it as a huge data cloud) the ECU selects an appropriate, pre-programmed output: when to add fuel, for how long, how much air to mix it with (throttle position), and when to burn it. It’s a mathematical juggling act, carried out before the bike was built, then programmed into it.
Engine modes are a piece in this programming jigsaw: they’re a crude ECU setting, adjusted at the handlebars, to give us an engine strategy that boffins have chosen as the best for a given scenario. It may slow down or restrict throttle opening, reduce ignition advance in the midrange, or simply add less fuel. Or all of them, to varying degrees, at once. But it’s nothing an ECU doesn’t already do.
So surely it’s as daft to ignore an engine mode that makes, say, learning a new track in the wet a less fraught, as it is to rail against automatic exposure and shutter speed settings on a camera? You can have fully manual if you want; just sometimes it’s easier to switch to auto.
But then, why stop with different power modes? Who wouldn’t prefer a get-me-home engine mode that gives half the power but 30 per cent better fuel economy? Or a ‘dirty’ mode to enrich the mixture specifically at 80mph in top gear for a smoother engine cruising on motorways? Now those really do seem like good ideas...
- Login to post comments

How do you spell spybot?
CS
Quite!
As for fuelling maps - Interesting things. As I've said I've never seen the need on any bikes I've had however I will hold judgement until I've tried a bike with them fitted.
What are others' thoughts?

.........,,,What are others' thoughts?
Hi NB.
Electronics leave me cold anyway, so these mode buttons don't offer any attraction to me. If you said "press this button sir and a supercharger will engage" then that would float my boat a lot more! Not least because there'd be shafts, pulleys, belts etc whizzing around.
The need for manufacturers to meet emissions, both noise and smelly stuff, aside, I believe a lot of technology on modern bikes is largely irrelevant on the road, especially if you're to come anywhere near speed limits and stand a chance of keeping hold of your licence.
Manufacturers flex your engineering muscles yes, but how about 350cc six's, 250cc fours, super singles, girder forks, hub centre steering etc. Something that really feels different to ride and looks the biz.

Couldn't agree more Pittsy. Fully active suspension and ABS are sound ideas, but suspension modes, power modes, brake modes, modes of modes, it's all a bit... well like surfing the web and configuring kit, than trusting your right wrist to be connected to a full blooded throttle and just getting on with the ride. I'd love a 250 six cafe racer. When it comes to something different to ride, with a real visual appeal and character (without getting too carried away and needing fettling every weekend), the BMW NineT hits the mark pretty well. Sold out worldwide for this year I believe...
- TECHNICAL FEATURES ARCHIVE
- Sensor and sensibility
- Putting gyroscopes under the microscope
- Naturally self-centring
- Giving me good vibrations
- Pressure is good for character
- Sticking the knife in forks
- Life is one big drag
- Engines are a waste of energy
- Sticking with aluminium
- Forcing the issue
- Holding back the gears
- Clearance approved
- Going off at a tangent
- No more crank calls please
- Seat of the pants stuff
- In the overlap of the gods
- Tough Torque
- Compounding: The Problem
- Fuelling about with maps
- Playing the frame game
- Putting up with intolerance
- Swingarms
- Variable Rates Of Interest
- Fins ain't what they used to be
- Reading between the centrelines
- Techwatch V4.0
- Yamaha Cross-Plane Triple
- Multistrada Skyhook
- BMW K1600GT Torque Comparison
- How ABS works
- Ducati 1199 Panigale Engine
- Bosch ABS testing
- BMW Semi-Active Suspension
- BMW TFT display
- Désaxé engines
- BMW Adaptive Lights
- Honda DCT
User login
Recent comments
-
In HONDA NC700X, kharli wrote:
-
In HONDA NC700X, kharli wrote:
-
In HONDA NC700X, Grump wrote:
-
In HONDA NC700X, kharli wrote:
-
In Lest we forget..., Captain Scarlet wrote:
-
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, malauder wrote:
-
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, Captain Scarlet wrote:
-
In Benelli 750 SEI, CCM wrote:
-
In Benelli 750 SEI, Gekom57 wrote:
-
In Benelli 750 SEI, Gekom57 wrote:
-
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, Grump wrote:
-
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, Navy Boy wrote:
-
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, Captain Scarlet wrote:
-
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, Grump wrote:
-
In HONDA NC700X, Grump wrote:
-
In Lest we forget..., Navy Boy wrote:
-
In Lest we forget..., unconventional rebel wrote:
-
In Captain Scarlet's next bike, unconventional rebel wrote:
-
In HONDA NC700X, unconventional rebel wrote:
-
In Lest we forget..., davvy wrote:
Search This Site
Donate to the Kevin Ash Fund
Kevin's funeral was held on Thursday 28th February 2013 and was well attended by family, friends and colleagues.
The Telegraph has very kindly established The Telegraph Kevin Ash Fund to assist with the education of Kevin's three daughters.
If you'd like to make a donation then you can use the PayPal 'Donate' button below which will allow you to donate from your PayPal account, or via credit or debit card. A small percentage (about 3.4%) will be retained by PayPal for the service.
Kevin's family have been touched by the generosity and messages of support from people using the website and would like to express their gratitude to those who have contributed in any way.
The donations keep coming in, thank you so much, and the family especially like it when you leave a message.
I can't say that I've really wanted to have fuelling maps on my Sprint GT. However the idea of an 'Eco' mode to help get some more miles from the tank sounds like a good idea.